Jail committee to take questions from public in Monday night meeting April 7 (View Videos Here)

March 31, 2025
By: Dwayne Page

The Jail Committee of the county commission has scheduled a meeting for Monday night, April 7 at 6 p.m. in the auditorium of the county complex to discuss potential locations for construction of a new jail and for the first time the committee will engage the public in a question-and-answer period during public comments.

Although the issue was on the agenda for discussion during Monday night’s regular monthly county commission meeting, jail committee chairman Larry Green moved to table it until April 7.

“We have actually had a couple of properties that became available late and Tony (Luna) has done a real good job of summarizing every piece of property that we are looking at. I would like to table this motion until next Monday night and have a jail committee meeting and in the public comment section let people ask us questions and we will give an answer as to why we are doing certain things and moving in certain directions so the public will know exactly what we are thinking,” said Green.

The commission approved Green’s motion.

Last Monday night during a workshop, the commission identified two potential locations for a jail which had not been previously discussed including 33 acres on West Main Street and 71.5 acres known as Smith Road properties on Smith Road. Since that meeting, Green said two other available properties have been mentioned including 40 acres on Robinson Road and 84 acres on Twilla Lane. The jail committee will discuss these potential options along with the property near Walmart on West Broad Street and the existing jail location on the public square.

Meanwhile during the public comment period Monday night, several people including Jonathan Bradley, Darcie Cripps, and Kathy Slager, addressed concerns about the county’s perceived direction on the jail issue along with Paul and Jodie Miranda who live on Creekside Drive in the Smith Road neighborhood near where a possible jail location is being considered. Jodie Miranda suggested that the county consider building the jail on the 15-acre county owned transfer station property instead of the locations under consideration on Smith Road and West Main Street.

“My family and I have lived on Creekside Drive in the middle of the Smith Road neighborhood for over 5 years now,” said Paul Miranda. “I’m here with information and voice my total opposition to consideration of the new county jail being built on the Smith Road property located about half a mile directly east of Northside Elementary School. Property originally purchased and approved for annexation into the city limits for a large residential development. Per the city mayor’s office that Smith Road property would not have been annexed into the city for building a jail”.

“I worked in law enforcement for 30 years with two different sheriff’s departments. Three years in two different county’s jails. The rest of my career as a deputy sheriff serving my community and putting criminals in jail. My wife for over 16 years at the same county jail. We have expertise with the types of clienteles that go in and out of a county jail cell and their unpredictability inside and outside of custody. To me, it’s obvious that the Smith Road location is not remotely suitable for a jail or a county complex. But current Tennessee state law allows county governments to buy land and not have to abide by any zoning restrictions as long as they build county facilities on the property. Yes, they can build whatever county government facilities they want”.

“Regardless of current plans talked about, if they later decide to add a county mental health facility or a county drug rehabilitation center, they could. And the notion about ball fields on the same property is just ridiculous. That’s an attempt to put lipstick on a pig and tell us it’s Miss America. As a parent and baseball coach, I’m certain people don’t want to have their kids playing ball right next to a jail”.

“Anyone released from this proposed jail site, would either go through the current residential neighborhoods on Smith Road toward Highway 70, if they don’t wander down other neighborhood streets. Or they go toward Cookeville Highway, into more densely populated and growing parts of the neighborhood, directly to the Northside Elementary School property. This could be every day, morning, noon, and night. I know from experience, not everyone getting out of jail has a ride to pick them up. So, vehicle and pedestrian traffic coming in and out of the area will increase.”

“Such close proximity to an elementary school, already designated for multi-million-dollar expansion to take students from Smithville Elementary should be a disqualifier. In an era of school safety and security to keep kids safer, anything that lowers current school safety and security standards should be rejected right out of the gate. Not one tax dollar should ever be spent that potentially makes a school even one percent less safe”.

“In the last year, six new family homes have been built and sold on West Smith Road. Nineteen more are being built in the next 12 months, designed to attract first time home buyers. With another proposed 120 home development off Twilla Lane. Exactly the kind of growth Smithville city wants. Not the growth the county commission is proposing. Homes close to an elementary school and downtown areas are especially desirable. Being right next to a county jail, not so much”.

“In closing, I hope everyone realizes that this is not just a Smith Road neighborhood, district 4 issue. Its an all of Smithville and DeKalb County issue. This particular decision affects every family with a child or children at Northside Elementary, those who will come from Smithville Elementary, and future parents and families that move into DeKalb County. Its truly a multi-generational decision. So, as a commonsense community, we can send a clear message of NO for this proposed location. As I’ve already said, its not just the Smith Road neighborhood. Its everyone’s neighborhood,” said Paul Miranda.

“I too strongly oppose the plan to purchase property on Smith Road or West Main Street to build a jail in a residential neighborhood, close to a school,” said Jodie Miranda. “A jail on either property would be dangerous for the community’s children and citizens”.

“I’m very familiar with incarcerated individuals and jail overcrowding, after 16 years as a correctional officer in California. I spent five years in the classification unit interviewing inmates and deciding where they should be housed. I’m well aware of the caliber of people arrested and the violent crimes of some county jail inmates. I do not want those citizens near my family or neighbors”

“The jail I worked in was overcrowded, so the court imposed a capacity limit. When the jail hit its max cap, the inmate with the nearest release date would be released early. This was a temporary fix to a permanent problem, so the county looked for property to build a second jail an hour north of the main jail. After years of searching, grant and funding issues, and battles with the community over location, rural acreage was bought in 2008. Fourteen years later, in 2022, the jail finally opened. It was a long process, but the county listened to the citizens’ concerns and found something that everyone agreed upon. They didn’t grab a piece of property that wasn’t a good fit just because the jail had to go somewhere”

“I also worked in the transportation unit, where I transported thousands of inmates to court, to more city and county jails than I care to remember, and every state prison within a six-hour radius. During my nine years of transporting inmates, not once did I encounter a jail or prison that was built in the middle of a residential neighborhood. There’s a reason for that. Its unsafe”.

“A dangerous situation happened while I worked one evening. A fire quickly surrounded the jail, and with no time for handcuffs, close to 300 inmates were evacuated. Unrestrained and escorted by only four officers, they walked over a mile to safety. The route they walked included no residential neighborhoods, and that was due to the county’s wise decision and forethought to build the jail away from homes. Unexpected situations can and will happen”.

“Many issues exist with building a jail on Smith Road or West Main Street. A jail would drastically reduce home values, pose a safety risk for families, diminish privacy, add noise, and bring in undesirable citizens. Traffic would be created by patrol vehicles, staff, and public doing inmate related activities like visitations, bail, and pickups. Northside Elementary School has a lot of traffic, which will increase after adding the new school. A jail, and possibly courtrooms, dispatch center, sheriff’s department, and EMS, built right down the road is an infrastructure nightmare”

“Lastly, please consider building on the 15-acre county owned transfer station property. The city owns a 20 acre parcel with a small portion being used as a dog park and parking lot. The city’s acreage is next to the county transfer station property, and acquiring some of the city’s acreage would add additional land for a jail. You recently discussed selling the county owned property located behind the police station to the city. If the county and the city work together, maybe an agreement could be made that benefits everyone,” said Jodie Miranda.

March 30, 2025
By: Dwayne Page

Should SRM Materials, LLC (Smyrna Ready Mix Smithville Quarry) be granted a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for the discharge of wastewater and storm water by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation’s Division of Mineral and Geologic Resource?

The answer may come within a few weeks.

If neighbors living near the proposed SRM limestone quarry location on North Driver Road at Snow Hill got their wish, the permit application would be denied by the state.

Several people spoke out in person against TDEC granting the permit during a public hearing held Thursday night at the county complex. Others in opposition but unable to attend either signed a list or had someone else to speak on their behalf.

Concerns raised included the potential threat the SRM quarry would pose to the environment and water quality in the area and repeated alleged state law violations by SRM at this location and other SRM facilities, among other issues. Because TDEC regulations provide for self-monitoring, many question whether SRM can be trusted to comply.

Last August the state found that SRM had been crushing at the Snow Hill location without issuance of an NPDES permit. In November SRM was again found by the state to be in non-compliance for operating without a permit and was forced by the state to halt activity at the site. Because of those violations alone, neighbors argue that the county should step in and enforce a cease and desist of SRM’s efforts to move forward since the required NPDES permit and others had either not been sought or approved prior to adoption of the county powers act last October which states in part:

“The County Clerk shall not issue a permit to operate a quarry, gravel pit, or rock crusher, cryptocurrency mine, landfill, adult entertainment or methadone clinic to any applicant who has not obtained all applicable state and/or federal permits required to operate such an enterprise or activity. The applicant’s acquisition of all applicable state and/or federal permits shall be a prerequisite to obtaining a business license or permit to operate such an enterprise or activity from the County Clerk”.

SRM has apparently not applied for a permit locally in compliance with the county powers act or provided an explanation as to why it should be grandfathered under the act.

The hearing Thursday night included public comments from Nancee Maderno (who participated by Microsoft Team), Lucas Antoniak, Steven Cantrell, Michael Antoniak, V.E. Garner on behalf of Doug Walter, Max Knudsen, Tony Clevenger (speaking for himself and for other neighbors listed who could not attend), and Krysta Eickmann.

At the end of the meeting, Jessie McBride, Office of External Affairs representative with TDEC, who served as hearing officer said “We will review all of your comments oral and written and make our decision. Based on the comments and evaluation, we can issue, modify, revise, extend the hearing, or deny the application. We can also ask for additional information and data from the applicant if needed to complete the decision process. A copy of our permit decision, response to comments, and the notice of determination will be mailed or emailed to those in our record of attendance and will also be uploaded to TDEC’s public data viewer,” she said.

Written comments related to the NPDES permit are still being accepted by the TDEC until April 7, 2025. Comments should be emailed to DMGR.PublicNotice@tn.gov or by mail to the TDEC Mining Section at 3711 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN 37921.

Thursday night’s public comment statements are as follows:

Nancee Maderno: “I oppose the granting of (permit) to SRM Materials. My husband and I own the property directly across from the proposed SRM limestone quarry”

“The only thing separating our borders is the Nashville Highway. SRM is requesting to dump industrial waste into Drivers Branch which joins our property under the highway and runs one third of a mile through our property exclusively past several wet and dry springs. Our only source of water for the homestead is a well which is a little more than 600 feet from the proposed quarry. My neighbors also rely on springs or wells for water. We have no other choice”

“In the 35 years that we have owned the property we have intentionally let it recover and let it return to its natural state. There have been no pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers used on the property since we’ve owned it. As a result, the number of fish, salamanders, crawdaddies and a variety of plants have all increased and reclaimed their natural habitats. Animals such as wild turkeys which were not present when he bought the property 35 years ago have also returned. A simple accident on behalf of SRM could erase all that”.

“At the very least, an environmental impact assessment should be performed before you even consider granting a permit to pollute Driver’s Branch. There’s too much at stake. I also believe that there are factual errors in SRM’s application we well. My well located as I said before approximately 600 feet away from the proposed mine does not even appear on the map of wells submitted with their application. What other wells might have been overlooked,”.

“From the very start of this process, SRM has behaved badly and this has been documented. How can I or any of us have faith that they can be trusted to honestly self-monitor industrial pollution they will be dumping into Drivers Branch”

Lucas Antoniak: “I’m a lifelong resident of the Snows Hill community, where I was born and currently live with my wife and daughter”.

“To begin, I believe this entire meeting is moot. By Tennessee Senate Bill 559, property owners should expect that the merits of a permit application will be judged on the law in effect at the time of application. Our county enacted the County Powers Act on October 28, 2024, and the state’s water permit details for SRM’s application shows that their application for a water permit was not accepted by the state until November 13, 2024, so they do not qualify for consideration by the county’s power’s act grandfather clause. Additionally, on their own website as today, SRM does not list the North Driver Road as an operational quarry location. SRM should recognize they are subject to our County Powers Act and withdraw from this project from further consideration”.

“With all of this said, for 8 years, I lived at 6307 Nashville Highway, which is my aunt and uncle Jim and Nancee Medrano’s property directly across from SRM’s planned site. The Medranos have owned the property for 35 years and plan to retire there within the next few years, and the current house location is approximately 600-700 feet from the quarry location with the only water source for the house being a well located next to the house, which I believe is omitted from the maps of this planned quarry. Driver’s Branch runs the entire length of their property and feeds directly into Dry Creek, a rich and clean source of water full of abundant wildlife and a resource of water for many citizens and their livestock. On the Medrano property directly across the proposed quarry, they have allowed it to return to nature and I can attest that it is a pristine sanctuary for an abundance of marine wildlife including fish, snakes, crawfish, salamanders, and herons. A 10-year-flood zone means there’s a 10 percent chance of flooding in any given year. At this property, flooding is a regular occurrence. In the 8 years I lived on that property and the years since, I can attest that intense flooding is a constant problem several times a year, enough that I would have to wade in waist-deep water to get to my car across Driver’s Branch”.

“I seriously doubt that SRM has the ability and interest to maintain the water as required by state. A simple Google search shows SRM’s history of multiple violations and non-compliance at their other sites in the state show that this is a company that does not hold to or respect the standards the state requires. If anyone wants to see what SRM will do to Driver’s Branch with their own eyes, I recommend visiting the dust-covered creek directly by SRM’s nearby Woodbury location. This is not a company that can be trusted to do their part to protect our water”.

“Additionally, I would like to add that this area is home to several large caves that are abundant in life and receive regular human visitors, including New Frontiers Christian Camp’s cave which is less than 2/3 of a mile down from the quarry location as the crow flies. I am greatly concerned about SRM’s chemical leaching into these caves water and harming the already fragile ecosystems within, as possible underground water pollution and diversion will lead to ecological collapse and greatly increase the odds of a cave collapse. New Frontiers brings hundreds of kids into this cave yearly – would you let your kid go into a cave knowing a quarry operating only 3000 feet away?”

“In closing, I want to say that Driver’s Branch and Dry Creek, which Driver’s Branch feeds into, must be protected. Beyond the rich diversity of wildlife that includes threatened species of amphibians and arthropods, many citizens of the county rely on the creek for their water and for fishing, peace of mind, and recreation, and a company with a history of non-compliance and violations should not be allowed to ruin it for their own profit. We only have one DeKalb County, and it is our duty as citizens to protect this water for generations to come by not allowing this company to contribute to its death”.

Steven Cantrell: “I appreciate the education that a number of us received prior to the formal part of this meeting. There was education in that to include that basically TDEC only has 10 inspectors for inspecting the mines across the state of Tennessee which raises a question for many of us especially for those who went and looked at the briefing that a number of the TDEC personnel participated in on December 10 in which it was highlighted that six of the seven mining operations that SRM has ongoing are in violation of state requirements. In some cases, its repeats. In some cases, based on my knowledge of the briefing that was provided to them on December 10 some of those actions have been violations or out of compliance for almost 10 months and we’re assuming that hopefully they have been corrected by this time”

“I’m very concerned with the briefing that was given because there was discussion about this is a prior quarry, but it was a quarry when the highway was built through there and all quarry operations there have ceased since that time. My concern right now is the area is basically a flat small area but everything outside that small area flows downhill. Back to my colleague’s comments (Lucas Antoniak) about flooding. That raises a lot of concerns about SRM’s capability to protect the water runoff especially considering their very poor record of doing that across the state which the Woodbury operation was considered out of compliance in that they were operating outside the permit area on December 10. I highlight that because as we, the citizens of DeKalb County are trying to express our concerns about the ability to safeguard our waters through this permitting process. The state has actually made us very concerned because most of the requirement to monitor that is self-monitoring which obviously based on the December 10 briefing of TDEC SRM has failed to adhere to those requirements”.

“Again, as a concerned citizen of this county and a state resident who is very concerned about the quality of life in the state but supports construction, I support responsible construction and, in this case, responsible quarry operations. This quarry is not in a place that will allow for efficient and safe operations”

“You (TDEC) are concerned only with the water so I will remain focused on the water. We don’t believe based on gravity that the state can ensure through the granting of that water permit and SRM that there will not be runoff, and we ask that the state look at that issue very closely. Look at what the operation will be doing when we have flooding as we had a few weeks ago and what happens in that area as opposed to what is happening on a normal day of operation. Look also at the fact that they began operation without any permit. TDEC shut them down and they began crushing stone again until TDEC caught them. Obviously, their self-monitoring didn’t help in that case. TDEC caught them and shut them down again. Seven operations in Tennessee. Six in violation. We don’t want violations here”.

Michael Antoniak: “I wish I could raise concerns here about the silica dust we’ve already dealt with, a known health risk from rock quarries. And it’s not the forum to discuss how the quarry will erode property values, threaten our rural lifestyle, peace of mind and homes families planned to enjoy into retirement. Nor have we had the opportunity to look in the eyes who seek to set this pit in our rural neighborhood for their profit, exclusively with callous disregard of everyone who calls this home”.

“Let’s turn to water, the essence of all life, and how this permit could impact all life forms along Drivers Branch and downstream. Our best hope is the state will fairly weigh the concerns of many residents against those of one corporation in its final review”

“The families bordering the quarry site on Snow’s Hill and in Chapman Hollow have no other source of water than freshwater springs or wells. These have been clean reliable sources for generations where city water does not reach”,

“On the South Driver side of the holler, across highway 70 across from the site, there are seven year-round springs and innumerable wet-weather springs.

Back in 2006, the Short Mountain Crayfish, a threatened species, was first discovered as unique to this area. The scientist who identified it, Dr. Ed Organ of liberty found it in one of those springs as he established its limited range. As far as I know the other springs and Drivers Branch have never been checked. I’ve also heard of hellbenders, an endangered species, downstream in Dry Creek and Smith Fork”.

“My sister and brother-in-law purchased the farm directly across from the proposed quarry in 1990. Their home site and well are within 600 feet. They have intentionally allowed their property to lie fallow so nature could rebuild. There has been no use of herbicides, fertilizer or pesticides on their land for 35 years, and all farming activity in this hollow stopped decades ago”.

“This permit seeks to release wastewater into Drivers Branch which runs exclusively through their farm from under Highway 79 and one third mile. At no point has anyone with the state or company contacted, consulted or advised them how this permit will impact their property.

The state may own Drivers Branch to its high-water mark, but they own the underlying land which will be most affected, that could be polluted by release of wastewater. One catastrophic release could undo everything regained”.

“Don’t they have the right to enjoy and manage land as they wish?’

“So, I request the applicant be required to conduct an environmental impact study on the south side of Driver Hollow to determine all at stake, and what could be lost to discharges from this quarry before this move forward”.

“Repeatedly this company has demonstrated it is not interested in being a good neighbor, from the blast which announced their presence, without warning, throwing rocks onto the highway and shaking homes miles around”.

“TDEC stopped work at this site twice because this company fired up without obtaining this required permit. Yet, they are still considered. Seems unfair that repeat offenders, scofflaws, get preferential treatment over homeowners trying to protect their lifestyle, their environment, the water and creatures it nourishes”.

“Will the state give more consideration to a profit-driven corporation, with no other interest in this area and despite past behavior, than law abiding citizens forced now to fight for the lives we’ve built, Drivers Branch and the water we depend on?”

“If a water source is disrupted or polluted by quarry activity, where do residents turn?”

“Based on its record of violations, we see no reason to trust this company. This permit should be denied. But if this quarry is allowed to begin operations, TDEC should advise us on monitoring the water, how to document pollution or disruption, and where to report it. We will. Thank you”.

V. E. Garner: I live directly across from the quarry I don’t actually have a statement for myself because I agree with what my neighbors have said about the impact on the water, but I am here to read a statement from a neighbor Doug Walter who is directly impacted but couldn’t be here”.

“The statement says my name is Doug Walter and I live directly across from Highway 70 from the proposed eastern end of this quarry. The eastern waterway shown on maps comes under the highway and goes in the front of my house. This water source can be directly affected by future quarry activities and affect salamanders, lizards, etc. that live in that waterway. This land has not been farmed for over 50 years so multiple species have been living undisturbed in this waterway for that time”.

“I do not feel that it is in the best interest of this community to have SRM permitted to operate another quarry in Middle Tennessee. SRM has had four violations on record as seen in TDEC records for attempting to operate prior to the permit process and potentially being issued. During the last violation the state has to ask them to remove their equipment. They also according to TDEC records available during the permitting processes have six of seven quarries in current violations”.

“Why would TDEC even consider offering a permit to SRM when they have a track record of violations in Tennessee. Why would you reward bad behavior. Based on their record, we are going to be dealing with a company that has not respected the state of Tennessee, DeKalb County, and the citizens living in this area.”

“I have managed several large companies during my career and if I had an employee performing to these standards, I would fire that person. I am respectfully asking you to consider the track record and actions of SRM and nor offer to permit another quarry for them that you will have to constantly monitor and have potential violations if you follow the track record seen in the TDEC records”.

Max Knudsen: “Several hours have already been committed to this cause. First fact: The County Powers Act was passed before the application was submitted. Second fact: This company is in violation in multiple locations. Third fact: People live in this area. People are thriving already in this area, and this is a head waters to the Liberty valley, the very first city in DeKalb County. Fact, Drivers Branch is a battleground from the civil war. There are unmarked graves of confederate and union soldiers there. Fact, Driver Branch was the location of a slave auction home for nearly one century. There are thousands of afro indigenous graves on that land. Fact, these hills and hollers are the tributaries to the Trail of Tears, and we should be talking rematriation and not continued exploitation. A wound that will never, ever be able to be healed. These are the facts. The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation should perform an artifacts and archeological study. They should perform a fish and wildlife study, and they should perform for us an environmental impact study. If we want to talk about grandfathers. Those cliffs are the grandfathers”.

Tony Clevenger: “I’m here for Chapman Hollow Road. I’m here for all my neighbors (who signed a list) who can’t be here because they had to work but we don’t want it. We all have springs and well water and we don’t know what is going to happen with it. We were all raised below the hill (Snow Hill) and we all played in Dry Creek. Will our grandkids be able to play in Dry Creek? I don’t want it. We don’t want it. Theres 40 people who don’t want it but they couldn’t be here. They have to make a living”

Krysta Eickmann: “I agree with pretty much everything everyone has said. When people show you who they are you definitely should believe them. That has never proven to be wrong for me in my life when someone demonstrates through their actions how they are going to be in the future you should take note so if you approve this for SRM they are going to be in violation again. They are going to be a headache for you and a real harm to our community in terms of being able to trust them to keep that water clean”.

“How often are you going to come and check? Can we check? I would assume that if they are submitting water to you, it can’t be trusted. If you come out once a year (announced) it may be on a day when maybe they are not releasing dust into the streams when the rest of the time they are. We need to know how we can monitor them”

“If you approve this, and I don’t think you should, they have already demonstrated they don’t deserve this and to make money off this land. They knew what the rules were. They have operated in this state for a long time. They broke the rules on purpose just thinking nobody would notice. They are not people you want to do business with. They are not people we want to do business with. Clearly, they are going to do whatever they think they can get away with and that is disrespectful to our community, our state, to you (TDEC), to the land, to everything. They have demonstrated they don’t care”’

“If you approve this, I’d like to see you there once a month randomly and surprise them. We want to know how we can monitor the streams and let you (TDEC) know because we know for a fact they will not be in compliance. You have already had to come out and slap them on the wrist twice. Why do you want to deal with that anymore? I agree we need construction, and we need gravel, but these are not the people who are going to run a good gravel company that is respectful and follows the laws of our state”.

March 29, 2025
By: Dwayne Page

The county commission may make a move Monday night toward establishing a building permit system through which the county could collect fees on inspections of new construction rather than the state.

The issue is on the agenda for discussion and possible action based on a recommendation of the county revenue committee. The meeting will be Monday, March 31 at 6:30 p.m. in the auditorium of the county complex.

According to committee chairman Larry Green, who gave a report to the county commission in a workshop last Monday night, builders currently obtain their permits online through the state and the state gets all the revenue from them. The idea is for the permits to be issued by the county and for the county to get the fees. The committee’s hope is that sufficient revenue would be raised through such a local permit program to not only fund the building inspector position but for other county needs.

“We (county) are currently a state regulated building program. We are asking to move us (county) to an exempt program for issuing building permits,” said Green. “It’s the same building codes the state uses now. Its just who gets the revenue from the permits, the state or county,” he said.

The first step is for the county commission to pass a resolution adopting the current state building codes for the county to go by and then hire a local part time building inspector to administer the program.

Green explained that the state would have oversight over the county to ensure compliance.

“I emailed the state and got a step-by-step process on how to do this,” said Green. “The first thing we have to do is approve a resolution adopting the state building codes that everybody already has to go by to build in the state of Tennessee. We would then have to enter into a contract with a building inspector. We have to hire one. He has to be a state of Tennessee certified building inspector in B-1 building, P-2 plumbing, and M-1 mechanical. The committee is recommending that we advertise for a building inspector that meets these qualifications and is certified in these areas,” Green explained. “Then we have to send back a 14-page survey to the state who will have someone go over that survey and then come out and audit us to make sure we have done everything right. Again, what the committee is proposing to do is for the county to follow exactly what the state is recommending as far as adopting building codes, hiring a building inspector, filling out the surveys, and then letting them (state) come out and audit us. Audits are done every three years,” said Green.

Fees generated through the issuance of local building permits would be expected to cover the salary of the part time building inspector.

“We would have to establish his salary. We came up with the same thing the City of Smithville is doing. The city pays their part time building inspector 65% of the building permit fees. The city gets the other 35%,” said Green. “I talked to the property assessor, and he said there is a room in his office that could be used by the building inspector to set up a computer and store his files. We would put the application for a building permit on our (county) website and the contractors could go directly to that and print it from there and then forward everything to the building inspector,” Green said.

“We would start out with a part time building inspector and pay him 65% of the permit costs. The county gets the other 35%. Building permit fees for commercial and residential structures would be based on a graduated scale according to the square footage, with additional costs for electrical inspections done by the state. We would exempt agriculture buildings. If a farmer wanted to build a shop or a barn, he wouldn’t need a permit. And you could build a deck on your house and wouldn’t need a permit. But if you add onto your house more than 30 square feet of living areas you would have to get a permit. That’s state law,” said Green.

“Basically, all this means is right now if you are building a house the contractor is doing this already,” said committee member Mathias Anderson. “They are just having to go through the state and they are paying the state for the permit. All we are doing is basically saying instead of calling Nashville you call the county,” he said.

“My biggest concern would be is there enough building to support this,” said Anderson. “DeKalb County had 165 homes built just in 2024. That was a huge increase from what I looked at previously,” he said. “The other thing is the salary. In a meeting we learned that the standard is a percentage of the fees so its not a salary. Its basically just a 1099. They only get paid when we get paid for the permits. Not anything additional except for the electrical inspection. The permit covers the cost,” said Anderson.

“Being in the real estate industry I have seen a lot of houses that should not have gotten passed and having somebody here to do this (inspection) I think would really improve the building here. Not saying that the state is not doing their job, but I would love to have somebody with an office here to go and check out these houses,” said Commissioner Tony Luna during last week’s workshop.

« First ‹ Previous 1 9 10 1112 13 21 111 2568 Next › Last »